Mayor Nutter s Fiscal Year 2016 - 1216 Words

Mayor Nutter has detailed the proposed Fiscal Year 2016 (FY16) Budget and the Fiscal Year 2016 – 2020 Five Year and Strategic Plan to City Council. â€Å"Today, my proposed FY16 budget recommends key investments that will strengthen our communities, with a particular focus on public safety and workforce development,† said Mayor Nutter. The proposed $3.95 billion FY16 General Fund budget has nearly $90 million in added expenditures, which represents a modest increase in spending over FY15. The majority of new spending, about $78 million, will go toward rising employee costs including pension, health care and arbitration awards. The Mayor has also committed to $169.6 million in City-supported Capital investments, the highest level of capital funding since FY02. Some of the Mayor’s FY16 spending proposals include: †¢ $5.5 million in new funding to strengthen the Department of Licenses Inspections, A Plan for a Safer City. This new funding will rise to $10.8 million total by FY18. †¢ $3.9 million for Philadelphia Parks Recreation to launch a new office dedicated to youth workforce learning and development through expansion of its existing summer jobs program, the establishment of a year-round career development, and the creation of a transitional jobs program. †¢ $18 million for the Office of Fleet Management to replace aged vehicles in the Police Department, and large vehicles and apparatus in the Fire and Streets Departments. †¢ $3.6 million for the Police Department to expandShow MoreRelatedLarge Events Of Philadelphia1330 Words   |  6 PagesLiabilities of Large Events Philadelphia consistently ranks among one of the most popular cities in the United States, both in terms of visitation and in terms of global recognition. This ranking is driven by prominent events in the past, and 2016 will be no different. Events such as the papal visit and the democratic nomination convention will inevitably influence Philadelphia’s economy, and it has long been an accepted notion that these events cause a positive impact. However, recent studies have

Terry Eagleton and Literature Theory - 3622 Words

Terry Eagleton What is Literature Doing a polemical study of contemporary literary theory, Eagleton introduces us in this world explaining what is actually fiction. a. Imaginative writing One definition is that literature is imaginative writing, based on its fictionality and do not engage in the literal truth. However, Eagleton rejects this theory, since the literature also includes nonfiction genres such as essay and autobiography. Distinguishing between fiction and fact, or truth and fantasy is considered too controversial to us led to a satisfactory demarcation. b. The particular use of language According to this definition, literature is a particular use of language, which changes the ordinary language and makes it stronger. Fiction†¦show more content†¦Eventually she began to have more masculine characteristics and served for the awakening of national identity (suitable for his victory over Germany in the 1st World War). Fighters for the English were not peer-amateurs who worked the first chair at Oxford and Camebridge, but they came from the social class of merchants and craftsmen. The most significant was F.R. Leavis. His followers opposed to the old ideology and emphasized the importance of critical analysis and rigorous attention to reading. 1932nd Scrutiny launched a magazine, which is characterized by belief in the importance of the moral dimensions of the pivotal role of the English language and literature throughout the life of English society, and have thereby created a movement that the English turned into a serious discipline. Favored the elitism, which is pretty pointless and unjustified, because not all who are not well acquainted with literature call on Les Misà ©rables and wildlife. Being a student of English in Camebridge late 20s and 30s meant to lead the most important and meaningful life. Leavses followers believed in the fundamental Englishness of English language, which is movin g the emphasis of the class within the culture and turned into folklore. American New Criticism blooms from 30s to 50s and includes the works of Eliot, Richards, and Leavis Empson. According to them, poetry is one possible solution loss of sensory richness, and theShow MoreRelatedEssay on A Kinder Reader1733 Words   |  7 Pagesunable to step back into the exact mold of a former self you left behind. Your borders have shifted, been expanded, even if only by a fraction. Terry Eagleton brings these ideas to light in his book, Literary Theory, when he extrapolates on what it means to become a â€Å"better† person—a transformation in which, liberal humanists would argue, literature plays a part.1 At first glance Moth Smoke appears to be a novel left out of the running for this transformative seal of approval. How can a readerRead MoreRocking Infant Poor And Unlucky Travelers By Jonathon Swift955 Words   |  4 Pagesauthor at the time, wrote several essays intending to spite the English and call the Irish to action to fight this oppressi on. The Irish did not respond. Terry Eagleton and Daniel Coleman’s theories prove that in his attempt to move Ireland to action Swift in actuality pacified their need to rebel again the encroaching English. His literature provided the humanization to prevent violence, the information to prevent further action, and the vicarious experiences that fulfilled the peasants for retributionRead MoreLiterature : The Definition Of Literature1302 Words   |  6 PagesLiterature is something that has been around for years and years. The definition of literature has been debated, scrutinized, and analyzed for all of those many years. It has also been debated over if literature has any value and if it is necessary to the world in which we live in. Another question arises when talking about literature is, if it does have any value at all, then how and why should it be taught in schools and to younger and future generations. What is literature? It is a questionRead MoreWhat Is Literature? Essay1778 Words   |  8 PagesSince the 18th century, the definition of the concept literature has become a problematic and a controversial issue among various literary schools. What is literature? What are the qualities that distinguish a literary text from a non-literary one? Does literature have any particular function in society? These are some crucial questions whose answers were supposed to limit and define the scope of literature. However, various literary and critical schools have advanced different and contradictoryRead MoreNationalism and the Imagination by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak555 Words   |  3 PagesNationalism and the Imagination by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak has being the hardest text I have read during my theory class at Sydney College of the Arts in 2014. My task was to read and explain the text to my theory class and my lecturer Dr Adam Geczy in 8 minutes as a YouTube video. This was an almo st impossible task because Spivak’s Nationalism and the Imagination is a small book of 75 pages and at Sydney College of the Arts’s library we are only able to borrow the book for 2 hours. I laterRead MoreLiterary Theories And Literary Criticism1318 Words   |  6 PagesLiterary theories and literary criticism New Historicism 1. †¢ It is a literary theory based on the criticism of Stephen Greenblatt and philosophy Michel Foucault. †¢ It states that literature should be studied and interpreted in context with the author’s history as well as the history of the critic. †¢ Acknowledges that the author’s literature is influenced by his/her situations or surroundings. †¢ The critic’s response is also influenced by his/her surroundings, beliefs, values and prejudices. †¢ ShowsRead MoreHow useful is ‘structural functionalism’ or ‘society as an organism’ as theoretical frameworks in considering the problem of ‘death’ as a sociological1775 Words   |  8 Pagesorganism’ in the thought of Rousseau (1913), before turning to consider these models specifically in relation to the problem of death. I discuss our Western fear of death, and suggest, drawing on Eagleton (2003), that any solution must involve facing this fear on a social level. There are sociological theories in which society is conceived of as a total structure made of functioning parts: this is structural functionalism. Rigney (2001: 17) describes structural functionalism as follows: â€Å"society isRead MoreModernism And Postmodernism1207 Words   |  5 Pagestraditional forms in various fields like architecture, art, music, and literature during the late 19th century and the early 20th century. The poet Ezra Pound perfectly expresses the soul of modernism in his famous phrase â€Å"Make it new!† (Pound, Ezra, Make it New, Essays, London, 1935). Modernism later gave way to post-modernist movements as a reaction in both the arts and philosophy. Post-modernism, defined by Terry Eagleton, a British literary critic as â€Å"the contemporary movement of thought whichRead MorePsychoanalytical Study of A Streetcar Named Desire Essays2039 Words   |  9 Pagesem outras palavras, pode ir al#233;m da ca#231;a aos s#237;mbolos f#225;licos; ela nos pode dizer alguma coisa sobre a maneira pela qual os textos liter#225;rios se formam, e revelar alguma coisa sobre o significado dessa forma#231;#227;o. EAGLETON (1994: 192) It is very debatable nowadays how much psychology can influence an author or how much the authors psychological features can influence his work. The creation of a character demands different kinds of information and the most importantRead MoreEssay Jane Austen2480 Words   |  10 Pagesand that she would grab any marriage that had good financial prospects. In the society and culture that Austen depicts, the male is regarded as the norm, as the central position from which the female is defined. This reflects structuralism’s theory that society and thinking are constructed on models of binary pairs, such as the pairing of man and woman. However, this pairing allows the man to take precedence over the woman, who is seen as inferior to his superiority. Women are defined by men

Bible 2 free essay sample

Bible A ; Iliad Translation Differences Essay, Research Paper Translations frequently led to misunderstandings, leting the transcriber to enforce his ain position of the text into the original. This leads to controversy in about every rendering of antediluvian plants. Any transcriber can read into and about rewrite the original work with what they deem true by pull outing and stressing certain footings. The writer of the THE HIDDEN BOOK OF THE BIBLE wrote his version about like an lineation, go forthing out certain, sometimes of import inside informations. The author? s attack to THE OXFORD STUDY EDITION. stays closer to the original format instead so pretermiting it. Although the ILIAD is normally non taken every bit actual as some readings the Bible, the fluctuation? s of linguistic communication use and messages are amazing. Numerous work forces have translated the romanticized verse form and with each, they bring their ain readings. Extensive seeking for effectual linguistic communication in Homer? s ILIAD would be unneeded. Techniques, such as similes appear legion times throughout the book being used to appeal to the hearers, or subsequently readers, senses. The linguistic communication is used to increase the significance of the transitions environing them. This technique subconsciously acts to do the audience? s head associate certain characters with words or phrases widening the properties of both the God? s and the worlds. By puting specific adjectives repetitively with the same name, the ILIAD is turned into a sensitive balance in which each character has an opposition. Every author brings a alone trait to the heroic narrative. The ILIAD translated by Michael Reck is far less formal and poetic than that of Chapman? s ILIAD. The latter author interpreted the authoritative verse form during the great period of Shakespeare, when poesy was an art known to all. About tierce of Homer? s lines describe barbarous warfare but written so placating and tuneful that frequently the genuineness of the venomous ness is lost. Chapman? s composing seems to idolize and honour the words of Homer more so Reck. He tries to incarnate the same significance, whether utilizing more or less words of Homer. Although conveying the same God, the two authors use different names. While Reck uses Zeus, Chapman prefers the Roman name Jove. At first, the passage of the names may be confounding because we associate names with persons but here they are both the same entity. Chapter XVIII lines 428 through 613 may outdo gaining control the differences of the transcriber? s kernels by comparing how they both speak of the same shield, Achilles Shield. Besides the obvious fluctuation in linguistic communication, due to the clip in which they wrote, they convey different accent on this subdivision. Chapman? s voice is in awe of the great achievement of Vulcan. He stresses Vulcan? s esteem for Thetis when he wrote that Vulcan shook her manus and asked: What wisht juncture brings the sea? s bright Queen To Vulcan? s house, that of all time yet hath beene So great a alien? Shew they reverend will Which mine of choyce bids me to carry through, If in the range of all mine Arte it lie Or be it possible to satisfie. The audience is lead to believe that Vulcan would make all that is in his power to delight the sea nymph. She is non merely considered a Godhead invitee when seated in a Ag throne but he besides shakes her manus widening his cordial reception and exemplifying his regard for her. In Reck? s version, Thetis is made to wait while Hephaestus ( Vulcan ) cleans up. He describes her visit as an? unexpected pleasance? but this does non direct out the same idolizing tone as Chapman. To reply his inquiry Reck merely says that? silverfoot Thetis answered him, crying? while in Chapman? s romanticized version her answer was? [ poured ] out in teares. ? By holding Thetis? s sorrows cascade out, Chapman sympathizes and expresses how tragic immature? acides ( Achilles ) decease is. This captures the subject that the heroic poem verse form is besides a calamity. This must be realized or the reader will be both disillusioned and disappointed. The terminal of Book XVIII, the description of Achilles shield, is a mirror image for the ILIAD on a smaller graduated table. Hephaestus crafts the shield demoing both the before and during stages of Achilles metropolis. The image, perchance confounding, is round. Get downing with the outer ring, the celestial spheres including the Sun and Moon were fashioned to demo the importance of how the Gods saw all that happened inside the human kingdom and how they were superior to all. The following two rings depict Achilles? metropolis during peacetime and wartime. The 4th round composing illustrates a agrarian scene and the fifth a dance scene. In the fifth, Reck writes that while the adult females are? graceful? and the work forces are? lusty. ? From outer to inner degree, the shield is a chronological line announcing the triumph of Greeks. Reck? s image paints the babe roar that frequently follows wartime. Being off for many old ages and losing many work forces in conflict, the Greeks ar e certain to reconstruct their population to its old stature. Thetis, merely a minor goddess, is balanced by Zeus ( Jove ) in Chapter Eighteen. Bing a sea nymph, H2O is associated with her. Zeus, male parent of both work forces and God? s, throws bolt of lightnings. His association with fire is placed on the opposing side of the balance from Thetis. He dwells in the celestial spheres above while the female parent of heroic poem? s hero resides in the deepnesss of the ocean. Zeus, being almighty, expresses his tempers non merely in fire, but besides in all natural signifiers. The graduated table is non tipped for when it rains, it is non clear but composed of? bloudie [ sic ] bluess. ? Both interlingual renditions hold the same narrative but it is the linguistic communication that changes the same words to give them wholly different significances. Without techniques like similes, which Homer liberally applied, the narrative would non of been brought down to earth, giving the audience something to associate to. Both work forces try to recapture the original message of his words that appeal to the audiences already experient emotions doing this verse form a authoritative. The two transcribers, the two poets, Reck and Chapman both justified their interlingual renditions to the dead writer/s of this verse form by being indebted to the Drug Enforcement Administration vitamin D, giving him award for his responsibility. Each with a different end, but same purpose of seeking to warrant their licence for construing a authoritative, the two successfully carry through this. When comparing THE OXFORD STUDY EDITION. to THE HIDDEN BOOK OF THE BIBLE, we see considerable differences. In a book where symbolism is important, the reader enters a kingdom where contemplation and apprehension are cardinal. The original strength must emerge or else a important higher significance will neer be realized. This exact point can non be better explained than if we compare the importance of name alterations. In THE HIDDEN BOOK OF THE BIBLE, Friedman excludes this all together. He does someplace, do a little, easy overlooked textual note that he is cognizant of this skip but deemed it non of import. But as one might expect, the names were non changed for aesthetic grounds. These alterations occur after a religious experience where 1 is changed ; they mark disclosure in the life of the characters. YHWH spoke stating: No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham ; for I have made you a male parent of many states. I will do you extremely fruitful ; and I will do state? s of you, and male monarchs shall come from you. Genesis 17:5-6 # 182 ; The changing of Abram # 8217 ; s name to Abraham was a waterproofing of the compact. Friedman neglected this therefore his version does non incarnate the importance of the understanding. Proper apprehension of the Bible is found in Numberss and words, supplying the reader with hints to detect what is and what is non of import. God # 8217 ; s whole program of redemption is promised in, and understood through, the compacts. By go forthing these out, Friedman besides leaves out the true significance of what is meant. In THE OXFORD STUDY EDITION. we see the promise that Abraham will father great states when he is really old. In the interlingual rendition, it was written that, ? When Abram was 99 old ages old, the LORD appeared to him and said: I am Almighty God. Live ever in my presence and be inculpable, so that I may do my compact with you and give you many descendants. ? Abram bowed low, and God went on, ? This is my compact with you: you are to be the male parent of many states. . . As for Sarai your married woman, you are to name her non Sarai but Sarah. I shall bless her and give you a boy by her. ? Genesis 17: 1-4 ; 15-16 Here, we see that Sarai? s name was changed exposing the importance in this sentence. The compact made with Sarah is different from the one made with Abraham, yet it is really similar. Giving her a new name seals it. God besides made a compact with the yet unborn Isaac. He promised to set up a compact with him and sealed it by giving him a name, even before construct. When Friedman interprets this subdivision he does non advert the age given. Those reading merely his edition lost the importance of the figure. The overdone figure shows how YHWH take this twosome and made it possible for this bare adult female to bare a kid. Although, 99 likely was non Abraham? s age, it was included to demo that if He wanted it would be made possible. In THE HIDDEN BOOK OF THE BIBLE, chapter 17 is non found easy, but the undertaking of seeking to turn up the events of this chapter is complicated. One of the most of import and reoccurring compacts, the compact of Circumcision, is non found at all. The seal of Circumcision was given to Abraham as a mark that merely through religion, God accepted him as righteous. The natural significance of Circumcision is that it is God # 8217 ; s manner of maintaining his people separate from the other states on Earth. The powerful address that Friedman absently neglected explains why it was so of import that this be keep by all His followings. It is stated in the OXFORD EDITION when God spoke to Abraham depicting how the compact will be maintain, He said: This is how you are to maintain this compact between myself and you and your posterities after you: circumcise yourselves, every male among you. You must be circumcised the flesh of your prepuces, and it will be the mark of the compact between us. Every male among you in every coevals must be circumcised on the 8th twenty-four hours both those born in your house and any alien, non a member of your household but purchased. Circumcise both those born in your house and those you buy ; therefore your flesh will be marked with the mark of my everlasting compact. Every circumcised male, everyone who has non had the flesh of his prepuce circumcised will be cut off from the family of his male parent ; he has broken my compact. Genesis 17: 10-14 Friedman subsequently shows the importance of this compact by including it in the narrative of the colza of Dinah, when her brothers use it as a gambit to weaken the enemy. By disregarding the beginning of the pattern, the reader does non to the full understand the purpose and significance. In its entireness, THE HIDDEN BOOK OF THE BIBLE leads to a more magnetic reading but does non keep all of the Bible? s importance. Friedman intertwines the sacred narratives doing it hard to turn up a peculiar chapter or even book. The reading is smoother and less formal but that takes off much of the significance. By miring the narrative, the writer makes the work more draw out, taking off much of its value. THE OXFORD STUDY EDITION.is a more straightforward attack following the original chapters and poetries. Chapman? s ILIAD can justifiably be compared to THE OXFORD STUDY EDITION. Both trace the way of both plants leting for every bit small personal penetration in the text as possible. Both have extended commentary on the transitions but non during the narratives. Set aside, the work forces allot themselves the licence to foster their penetration before or after the existent organic structure of the texts. The transcribers of THE HIDDEN BOOK OF THE BIBLE and Reck? s ILIAD stray off from the original text more so so the old two mentioned. Because of the job with interpreting Greek, every version of the ILIAD will change but it the specific word use and accent that makes them exceeding. The old illustrations, drawn about the manner of each transcriber demonstrate the many disagreements found when covering with translated work.

The Love Of Science (Nathainel Hawthornes The Birthmark) Essays

The Love Of Science (Nathainel Hawthorne's The Birthmark) The Love of Science In this essay, I will discuss how science manifests evil in Nathaniel Hawthorne's ?The Birthmark.? Science is a major asset in the world today. The use and dependence of science is overwhelming. Many scientific experiments are ungodly. Hawthorne brings up many important issues in his story. I will concentrate on how Aylmer puts his love for science before his love for other people and himself. Nathaniel Hawthorne was born in Salem, Massachusetts, of a prominent Puritan family. Hawthorne's father died when he was very young and this influenced his somber and solitary attitude. Hawthorne read works by many different poets and romancers. As Hawthorne became a man, he married Sophia Peabody. Even though his marriage was a happy turning point in his life, Hawthorne still refused to share the optimistic philosophy of Transcendentalism. While making his home in the Old Manse, he continued his analysis of the Puritan mind. This was the breaking point for his writing Moses From and Old Manse, which included ?The Birthmark.? In Hawthorne's ?The Birthmark,? Aylmer actually puts his first love, science, aside to persuade a lover. He feels that it is time to find a wife. Years ago it was not unusual for the love of science to rival the love of woman in its depth, and absorbing energy.? (Hawthorne 277) Once married, Aylmer brings to his new wife's attention the small birthmark upon her cheek. When he asks her if she has ever thought about removing it, she is very upset with her husband. He asks, ?'? has it never occurred to you that the mark upon your cheek might be removed?'? (Hawthorne 278) She is surprised that her husband would even ask his wife such a question. Her response is ?'?it has been so often called a charm that I was simple enough to imagine it might be so.'? (Hawthorne 278) Aylmer's response is very cruel. He says ?'?we hesitate whether to term a defect or a beauty, shocks me?'? (Hawthorne 278) His wife is deeply hurt (Hawthorne 278) and then questions Aylmer's reasons for marrying her. Did he marry Georgiana only to use her to remove the birthmark upon her precious face? As sad as it is to admit, he may very well have. The birthmark was barely noticeable. Why would he bring up such a discussion? Why should it matter if Georgiana had a small birthmark on her cheek? ? Masculine observers of the birthmark did not heighten their admiration, contended themselves with wishing it away (Hawthorne 278) If no other man had minded, why did Aylmer? If he minded so much, why did he marry her? Of course Georgiana is hesitant of the mysterious cure Aylmer has brought to her attention. ?'Perhaps it removal may cause cureless derformity; or it may be the stain goes as deep as life itself. Again: do we know that there is a possibility?of unclasping the firm grip of this little hand which was laid upon me before I came into this world?'? (Hawthorne 280) Are there side affects? If so, what do they consist of? The only response Aylmer gives is ?'?I have spent so much thought upon the subject?I am convinced of the perfect practicability of its removal.'? (Hawthorne 280) He is sure that nothing will go wrong. But, of course, will Aylmer really have to make Georgiana aware of any side affects that he knows of? He is so worried about his wife's looks and his love for science, he does not care. Georgiana then worries about her husband's feelings of disgust and says ?'If there be the remotest possibility of it?let the attempt be made at whatever risk. Danger is nothing to me; for life, while this hateful makes me the object of your horror and disgust, -- life is a burden which I would fling down with joy. Either remove this dreadful hand, or take my wretched life! You have deep science.'? (Hawthorne 280) She trusts her husband and his work. At this point, Aylmer should have told his wife that he did not car about her looks, he only for her inside beauty. He did not do that though. He simply replies ?'?doubt